DETERRENT DEBATE: Lawyers were divided over whether the rules that were cut helped protect families, while one justice disapproved of Interpretation No. 791
Taipei Times
Date: May 30, 2020
By: Wu Cheng-feng, Chang Wen-chuan and Jake Chung / Staff reporters, with staff writer

Judicial Yuan President Hsu Tzong-li, center, who also chairs the Council of Grand Justices, announces Constitutional Interpretation No. 791 in Taipei yesterday.
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
The 15 justices issued the interpretation after hearing debate on the article, which said that both people convicted in a case of adultery face up to one year in prison, although no trial was possible without a complaint by the spouse.
The clause says that in the case of an offense specified in the Criminal Code, the withdrawal of a complaint against an accused spouse is not the same as the withdrawal of a complaint against the other party in the alleged adulterous relationship.
The interpretation was issued after 18 judges and a man convicted of adultery this year asked the Council of Grand Justices to overturn Interpretation No. 554, which found the Criminal Code article constitutional. [FULL STORY]